Team: Shams Hazim, Timon Mekke, Teun Graafmans

This assignment was a collaboration between the classes: ergonomics and branding. The briefing was to design a series of gardening tools which are verified according to ergonomic values. The series contain a pruning shears, grass shears and plant sprayer.

The products from GRØN are aimed at the high-end segment. The pruning shears has a robust and minimalistic design. This amplifies the connection with nature and helps the user to relax while gardening.

Ergonomics

Team: Shams Hazim, Timon Mekke, Teun Graafmans

Briefing

This assignment was a collaboration between the classes: ergonomics and branding. The briefing was to design a series of gardening tools which are verified according to ergonomic values. The series contain a pruning shears, grass shears and plant sprayer.

Intro

The products from GRØN are in the high-end segment. The pruning shears has a robust and minimalistic design. This amplifies the connection with nature and helps the user to relax while gardening.

We made several mood boards to guide us in our design process. We made mood boards for design language, target group and setting.

GRØN is inspired by Scandinavian design. We chose a minimal design language with the use of natural materials such as ceramic and wood.

The “ø” in the logo is altered to resemble a leaf. This is a subtle reference to the natural materials used in the products.

Analysis

Market positioning

We’ve made a comparison between the main competitors in gardening tools, including ourselves. This gave us some guidance in the design process.

We used DINED for the evaluation of the ergonomic values. Not all measurements could be verified this way so we made models and tested them on random people in our target group.

From the test results for width, we can conclude that most respondents prefer model 1. Model 1 scores averaged 4/5, model 2 scores 3.18/5 and model 3 scores averaged 1.43/5. So the width of the handle will resemble the width of model 1 which is in-between 26mm and 30mm.

Width

From the test results for width to conclusion is that most respondents prefer model 1. Model 1 scores averaged 4/5, model 2 scores 3.18/5 and model 3 scores averaged 1.43/5. So the width of the handle will resemble the width of model 1 which is in-between 26mm and 30mm.

Width

From the test results for width to conclusion is that most respondents prefer model 1. Model 1 scores averaged 4/5, model 2 scores 3.18/5 and model 3 scores averaged 1.43/5. So the width of the handle will resemble the width of model 1 which is in-between 26mm and 30mm.

According to the participants, the concave handle is the least favorite. This model scored an average score of 3.18. The convex and straight model scored about the same, with the convex scoring average 3.72 and the straight average 3.78. The conclusion from these results is that there is not that much of a difference between the models.

Curvature

According to the participants, the concave handle is the least favorite. This model scored an average score of 3.18. The convex and straight model scored about the same, with the convex scoring average 3.72 and the straight average 3.78. The conclusion from these results is that there is not that much of a difference between the models.

Curvature

According to the participants, the concave handle is the least favorite. This model scored an average score of 3.18. The convex and straight model scored about the same, with the convex scoring average 3.72 and the straight average 3.78. The conclusion from these results is that there is not that much of a difference between the models.

Model 1, with the hinge close to the top of the model, scores much less than the others. Its score is average 2.07. The score of model 2 is 3.43 and model 3 scores 3.79. Thus model 3 is preferred by a small margin.

Hinge

Model 1, with the hinge close to the top of the model, scores much less than the others. Its score is average 2.07. The score of model 2 is 3.43 and model 3 scores 3.79. Thus model 3 is preferred by a small margin.

Hinge

Model 1, with the hinge close to the top of the model, scores much less than the others. Its score is average 2.07. The score of model 2 is 3.43 and model 3 scores 3.79. Thus model 3 is preferred by a small margin.

GRØN, as a brand, incorporates modern design with natural materials. The brand stands for honesty and durability. We accomplished this by exposing the raw materials and use the intrinsic properties of the materials.